Abstract
Expandable polystyrene (EPS) nozzle covers can be used to replace traditional metal nozzle covers due to their excellent mechanical properties, as well as being lightweight and ablatable. As an important part of the solid rocket motor, the nozzle cover needs to be designed according to the requirements of the overall system. This study lays a theoretical foundation for the engineering design and performance optimization of the EPS nozzle cover. In this paper, the method of combining test research and numerical simulation is used to explore the pressure bearing capacity of EPS nozzle covers with different thicknesses under linear load. Firstly, the quasi-static tensile, compression and shear tests of EPS materials were carried out by universal testing machine, and the key parameters such as stress-strain curve, elastic modulus and yield strength were obtained; Based on the experimental data, the constitutive model of EPS material with respect to density is fitted and modified; The VUMAT subroutine of the material was written in Fortran language, and the mechanical properties of the nozzle cover with different material model distribution schemes and different thicknesses were explored by ABAQUS finite element numerical simulation technology. The results indicate that the EPS nozzle cover design based on the two material model allocation schemes better aligns with practical conditions; when the end thickness of the EPS nozzle cover exceeds 3 mm, the opening pressure formula for the cover based on the pure shear theory of thin-walled circular plates becomes inapplicable; the EPS nozzle cover exhibits excellent pressure-bearing capacity and performance, with its pressure-bearing capacity showing a positive correlation with its end thickness, and an EPS nozzle cover with a 9 mm end thickness can withstand a pressure of 7.58 MPa (under internal pressure conditions); the pressure-bearing capacity of the EPS nozzle cover under internal pressure conditions is higher than under external pressure conditions, and when the end pressure-bearing surface thickness increases to 9 mm, the internal pressure-bearing capacity is 3.13 MPa higher than under external pressure conditions.