Initial experience of utilizing a lower-profile transradial approach for mechanical thrombectomy: Comparable efficacy to larger-bore transfemoral approaches

初步经验表明,采用低位桡动脉入路进行机械取栓术与采用较大口径股动脉入路疗效相当。

阅读:1

Abstract

BackgroundWhile transfemoral access is commonly used for mechanical thrombectomy (MT) due to large-bore catheters providing greater aspiration forces, some centers employ transradial access (TRA) in select cases with favorable anatomy. We report our institutional experience to evaluate the efficacy of using TRA as the default approach for large-vessel occlusion (LVO) with a streamlined, lower-profile system.MethodsA retrospective review was conducted on 23 consecutive thrombectomies performed via TRA, regardless of patient anatomy or LVO location. Demographic and procedural variables were collected.ResultsAmong the 23 patients (median age 72 years; 52% female; 57% white), occlusions were primarily in the M1 territory (44%) and carotid terminus artery (13%). The average time to first pass was 10 ± 7.7 min, and time to recanalization (thrombolysis in cerebral infarction [TICI] ≥2b) was 16 ± 12.5 min. Intracranial atherosclerosis requiring stenting or balloon angioplasty occurred in 20% of cases. For these patients, mean recanalization time was 17 ± 13.6 min; for those requiring thrombectomy alone, it was 8.8 ± 5.1 min, all achieving TICI ≥2b in a single pass. Final TICI scores were 3 in 73% of cases, 2c in 23%, and 2b in 4%.ConclusionA streamlined, lower-profile TRA system can effectively serve as an upfront modality for MT and appears to perform comparably to larger-bore, transfemoral alternatives. This technique offers the benefits of TRA without compromising efficacy.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。