Abstract
BACKGROUND: The Kidney Research Scientist Core Education and National Training (KRESCENT) program was established to enhance kidney research capacity in Canada by providing salary support and specialized training for kidney researchers in Canada. This study is a qualitative evaluation to gain insight into participants' experiences in the program. OBJECTIVE: To explore participants' perspectives of the KRESCENT program to (1) identify potential differences in perspectives between early and recent program cohorts and (2) understand perceived impact on participants' career trajectory and professional development. DESIGN: A qualitative interview study using semi-structured interviews. SETTING: Semi-structured interviews were conducted online via Zoom. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals who have previously completed, or who are currently enrolled in the KRESCENT program. METHODS: Participants were selected through purposive sampling, and semi-structured interviews were conducted to explore their experiences in the program. Data were analysed using thematic analysis in NVivo software. RESULTS: Participants (N = 30; M(age) = 41.2, SD(age) = 8.3, 53% Female) were interviewed, and the following emergent themes from the data were identified: (1) Navigating Expectations within KRESCENT, (2) Developing a Foundation for Success in Kidney Research, (3) Perceived Program Impact, (4) Fostering Multidisciplinary Collaboration and Diversity, (5) Considerations for Future Awardees. LIMITATIONS: The initial coding was conducted by a single researcher. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the long-term impact of the KRESCENT program on kidney research in Canada by exploring participants' experiences and valued program elements beyond traditional career milestones. Findings emphasize that structured funding programs enhanced with opportunities for mentorship, networking, and skill development significantly support career advancement. These results reinforce the importance of continued investment in KRESCENT to build kidney research capacity and suggest that similar training models could benefit other health research fields.