Comparative Efficacy of Different Attractants for Surveillance of Synanthropic Flies Across Seven Zoogeographical Regions of China

不同引诱剂在中国七个动物地理区域监测伴人蝇类的相对效果

阅读:1

Abstract

Accurate identification of fly species composition and their responses to attractants is critical for risk assessment and targeted vector control. To evaluate the efficacy of different attractants in surveillance and their species-specific trapping biases, a standardized field study was conducted from June to September 2021 across seven representative cities in China's major zoogeographical regions: Xining, Ürümqi, Yanji, Beijing, Chongqing, Kunming, and Sanya. Cage traps baited with either fish offal or sugar-vinegar solution were deployed, supplemented by hand-net collection. A total of 134 traps were set, yielding 2132 flies belonging to 21 species. Fish offal captured 1961 flies (91.9%), significantly more than the 101 flies (4.7%) caught with sugar-vinegar solution (χ(2) = 1582.3, p < 0.001). Lucilia sericata was the dominant species (885 individuals, 41.51%), followed by L. cuprina (178, 8.35%), Sarcophaga portschinskyi (127, 5.96%), and Sarcophaga africa (100, 4.70%). High-risk taxa (Calliphoridae and Sarcophagidae) were almost exclusively attracted to fish offal. Our findings demonstrate that protein-based baits, such as fish offal, are substantially more effective than traditional sugar-vinegar solutions for capturing epidemiologically relevant fly species across diverse ecological zones in China. We recommend prioritizing proteinaceous attractants in national fly surveillance programs and advocate for routine species-level identification to enable risk-informed vector monitoring.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。