Workforce Allocation in Urban Community Mental Health Services: GIS-Based Analytical Insights for Policy and Planning

城市社区心理健康服务中的人力资源配置:基于地理信息系统的政策和规划分析见解

阅读:1

Abstract

Background/Objectives: This study aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the current mental health workforce and the factors influencing its distribution within adult community mental health services in Western Australia's North Metropolitan Health Service. Methods: Mental health workforce supply across North Metropolitan Statistical Area Level 2 (SA2-Australian Statistical Geography Standard) was estimated using the Geographically-adjusted Index of Relative Supply (GIRS) and categorised as low (0-3) or moderate-to-high (4-8) for analysis and testing associations with multiple covariates. Population, clinic, and individual-level data were analysed using principal component analysis and logistic regression to identify the factors associated with workforce distribution. Results: Of the 68 SA2s analysed, 25 SA2s (representing 45 suburbs) were identified as having a low workforce supply, defined by a GIRS score of ≤3. These areas were compared to those with a moderate-to-high supply (GIRS > 3) to assess the differences in service performance. A principal component analysis identified three key components within the data: service usage, health service providers, and service efficiency. A logistic regression analysis revealed that areas with a low workforce supply were significantly more likely to experience reduced service usage (OR = 3.3, p = 0.037, CI [0.09-0.92]), indicating fewer patient interactions and lower engagement with mental health services. In addition, these areas demonstrated a lower service efficiency as evidenced by longer wait times (OR = 3.7, p = 0.002, CI [1.62-8.50]), suggesting that workforce shortages directly impact timely access to health care. Conclusions: The findings revealed disparities in workforce supply across different urban locations, with low-supply areas facing tangible challenges in service accessibility and operational efficiency. These findings highlight the need for targeted mental health workforce planning. Developing and implementing best practice guidelines is essential to effectively manage service demands and reduce waitlists.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。