Outcomes from blind versus ultrasound-guided uterine evacuation: A retrospective cohort analysis

盲法与超声引导下子宫清宫术的结局:一项回顾性队列分析

阅读:1

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Women may need a surgical uterine evacuation for miscarriage, surgical termination, or retained products of conception. Previous research has indicated possible complications of uterine dilatation and curettage and potential benefits of an ultrasound-guided procedure. This study aimed to compare the rate of complications for uterine evacuation when performed blind or with ultrasound guidance, including whether the presence of patient risk factors determined the use of ultrasound guidance. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 733 cases in an Australian hospital between January 2019 and December 2023. Medical records, imaging, and surgical reports were searched for patient demographics, risk factors, and the presence of surgical complications. Primary outcomes were complications of uterine perforation, false passage, incomplete curettage, heavy blood loss, or laparoscopy. Secondary outcomes were patient demographics and potential presurgical complication factors. The study created two cohorts: patients receiving evacuation performed blind or with ultrasound guidance. RESULTS: The uterine evacuation was performed blind for 421/733 (57%) women and ultrasound-guided for 312/733 (43%) women. The ultrasound-guided group included higher gestational ages 8 [7-11] weeks vs blind 8 [7-9] weeks, more patients with risk factors (OR 1.7, CI: 1.3 to 2.3), more patients for surgical termination (OR 15.3, CI: 5.4 to 43.3), or postpartum RPOC removal (OR 2.3, CI: 1.3 to 3.9). The ultrasound group had lower overall blood loss (20 mLs vs 30 mL) and clinically significantly lower volumes of continuing retained products of conception, 0.66 cm(3) [0.53-1.23] vs 8.35 cm(3) [1.49-18.94]. There was no difference in complications between groups after adjusting for gestational age (OR 1.0, CI: 0.5 to 2.0). CONCLUSIONS: There were low complication rates for blind and ultrasound-guided uterine evacuations. However, ultrasound guidance was utilized for higher-risk cases and significantly reduced the volume of retained tissue in complicated cases. The use of ultrasound guidance by doctors and sonographers for uterine evacuation is a compelling choice where available.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。