Prone positioning in pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

儿童急性呼吸窘迫综合征的俯卧位治疗:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析

阅读:1

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in children, characterized by acute lung inflammation and impaired gas exchange, presents unique therapeutic challenges due to developmental differences in respiratory physiology. While prone positioning is established in adult ARDS management, its efficacy in pediatric populations remains debated. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating prone vs. supine ventilation in children and adolescents (0-18 years) with ARDS. Databases including PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and CENTRAL were searched up to October 29, 2025. Methodological quality was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool, and statistical synthesis was performed in R. RESULTS: Thirteen RCTs (1,529 patients) were included. A meta-analysis of ten trials demonstrated a lower risk of death with prone compared with supine ventilation [risk ratio (RR) 0.67, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.57-0.79; P = 0.0443]. Prone positioning also improved oxygenation, with a mean difference (MD) in PaO₂/FiO₂ ratio of 33.37 mmHg (95% CI 19.07-47.68). The duration of mechanical ventilation was slightly shorter in the prone group (MD = 0.90; 95% CI: 0.82-0.99), but the effect size was small and of uncertain clinical relevance, and there was no clear reduction in intensive care unit length of stay. Heterogeneity was moderate for mortality (I(2) = 53.6%) and substantial to extreme for oxygenation outcomes (I(2) > 90%). Funnel plots did not show marked asymmetry, although the limited number of trials reduces the power to exclude publication bias. CONCLUSION: Prone positioning may reduce mortality and improve oxygenation in pediatric ARDS, but does not clearly shorten mechanical ventilation duration or ICU stay. These potential benefits support considering prone positioning as an adjunctive strategy in pediatric critical care protocols, while underscoring the need for larger, high-quality RCTs to refine patient selection and optimize implementation strategies.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。