Abstract
The purpose of this study was to understand whether footwear midsole thickness can decrease the metabolic cost of running by increasing the effective leg length of a runner. We also sought to understand the effect of midsole compliance on these measures. Participants (N=16) ran on a treadmill at 14 km h-1 in four mass-matched shoe conditions: 30, 40 and 60 mm thickness of a firm midsole foam and 60 mm thickness of a compliant midsole foam. Over two testing sessions, we measured metabolic cost (two 5-min trials in each condition) and biomechanical measures (one 2-min trial in each condition). Increasing thickness in the firm midsole conditions increased effective leg length during early, mid and late stance (all P<0.001). However, metabolic cost increased (P=0.031). Changing material, from firm to compliant, decreased effective leg length during midstance (P<0.001), but not during early or late stance. This change in material also decreased metabolic cost (P<0.001). Results suggest that increasing midsole thickness can increase the effective leg length of a runner, but this isolated effect leads to increases in metabolic cost. In contrast, increasing midsole compliance, while keeping midsole thickness constant, leads to reductions in metabolic cost, agreeing with previous literature. We suggest that the performance benefits seen in advanced footwear technology are likely due to increased resilience of the midsole but not to increases in effective leg length from increased midsole thickness.