Inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique versus internal limiting membrane removal in large macular hole with different hole edge configurations: a comparative study

不同边缘形态的大黄斑裂孔中,内界膜瓣翻转术与内界膜切除术的比较研究

阅读:1

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the anatomical and functional outcomes of the inverted internal limiting membrane (ILM) flap technique and the complete ILM removal in the treatment of large macular hole (MH) > 400 μm with or without Hole-door structures. METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed 56 patients with MH > 400 μm. Based on hole edge morphology evaluated by archived intraoperative optical coherence tomography (iOCT) images, patients were divided into the Hole-door group (Group 1) and the Negative group (Group 2). Within each group, patients were further classified into two subgroups based on the surgical technique performed: complete ILM removal (Group 1-a, 2-a) and visco-assisted ILM flap (Group 1-b, 2-b). External limiting membrane (ELM) and ellipsoid zone (EZ) restoration and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) were assessed at 3 and 6 months post-surgery. RESULTS: Correlation analysis found no significant link between preoperative MHD and postoperative outcomes. The Hole-door group showed better vision, ELM, and EZ recovery than the Negative group, regardless of ILM removal or visco-assisted ILM flap (P < 0.05). In evaluating the prognoses between both techniques for macular holes with or without Hole-door structures, at 6 months, BCVA and ELM/EZ restoration were similar in Groups 1-a and 1-b (P > 0.05), but at 3 months, Group 1-b showed better results (P < 0.05). In the negative subgroups, Group 2-b outperformed Group 2-a in BCVA and ELM and EZ restoration at 6 months (P < 0.05) and in BCVA and ELM restoration at 3 months, though not in EZ restoration (P<0.05) Furthermore, functional and anatomical outcomes at 3 months showed significant correlation with the 6-month results, despite the ongoing microstructural improvements identified between these two time points. CONCLUSION: Large macular holes with Hole-door structures have a better prognosis than those without. In these cases, BCVA and retinal microstructure restoration are similar between ILM removal and ILM flap surgery, but the ILM flap accelerates recovery.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。