Safety and efficacy of PEG-rhG-CSF as primary prophylaxis for neutropenia in gastrointestinal cancer patients receiving combination chemotherapy including oral agents: a prospective, exploratory, non-randomized controlled study

聚乙二醇化重组人粒细胞集落刺激因子(PEG-rhG-CSF)作为接受包括口服药物在内的联合化疗的胃肠道癌症患者中性粒细胞减少症一级预防药物的安全性和有效性:一项前瞻性、探索性、非随机对照研究

阅读:1

Abstract

PURPOSE: The safety and efficacy of pegylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (PEG-rhG-CSF) for prevention of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN) in patients undergoing oral chemotherapy remain unclear. This study aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of PEG-rhG-CSF as primary prophylaxis for CIN in gastrointestinal (GI) cancer patients receiving combination chemotherapy regimens that include oral chemotherapy agents. METHODS: This is a prospective, single-center, open-label, exploratory, non-randomized controlled study. GI cancer patients was treated with intravenous oxaliplatin (130mg/m(2) on day 1) combined with either oral capecitabine (1000mg/m(2)) or S-1 (an oral fluoropyrimidine combination of tegafur, gimeracil, and oteracil potassium; 40-60 mg) administered twice daily on days 1-14 of a 3-week cycle. The treatment group received subcutaneous injection of PEG-rhG-CSF (6mg) 24 hours after oxaliplatin, while the control group received no primary prophylaxis. The primary endpoint was safety, and secondary endpoints included the incidence of CIN. RESULTS: Between March 2022 and January 2023, 49 patients were screened, and 43 patients who completed at least two treatment cycles were included in the final analysis (26 in treatment group and 17 in control group). The overall adverse events (AEs) did not differ statistically (93.8% vs 100.0%, p = 0.542). For grade ≥ 3 AEs, the incidence of neutropenia was significantly lower in the treatment group compared to the control group (3.1% vs 35.3%, p = 0.005). No significant differences were observed in the rates of grade ≥ 3 thrombocytopenia (6.3% vs 17.6%, p = 0.326) and leukopenia (3.1% vs 0.0%, p = 1.000). Grade≥2 CIN was significantly lower in the treatment group (25.0% vs. 76.5%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In GI cancer patients on oral agents, primary PEG-rhG-CSF prophylaxis was well-tolerated and reduced grade ≥2 CIN, though randomized studies are needed. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://www.chictr.org.cn, identifier ChiCTR2100054854.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。