Abstract
Visual adaptation and attention are two processes that help manage the limited bioenergetic resources of the brain for perception. Visual perception is heterogeneous around the visual field: It is better along the horizontal than the vertical meridian (horizontal-vertical anisotropy [HVA]), and better along the lower than the upper vertical meridian (vertical meridian asymmetry [VMA]). Recently, we showed that visual adaptation is more pronounced at the horizontal than the vertical meridian, but whether and how this differential adaptation modulates the effects of covert spatial attention remain unknown. In this study, we investigated whether and how the effects of endogenous (voluntary) and exogenous (involuntary) covert attention on an orientation discrimination task vary at the cardinal meridians, with and without adaptation. We manipulated endogenous (Experiment 1) or exogenous (Experiment 2) attention via an informative central or uninformative peripheral cue, respectively. Results showed that (a) in the non-adapted condition, the typical HVA and VMA emerged in contrast thresholds; (b) the adaptation effect was stronger at the horizontal than the vertical meridian; and (c) regardless of adaptation, both endogenous and exogenous attention enhanced and impaired performance at the attended and unattended locations, respectively, to a similar degree at both cardinal meridians. Together, these findings reveal that, despite differences between endogenous and exogenous attention, their effects remain uniform across cardinal meridians-even under differential adaptation that reduces intrinsic asymmetries of visual field representations.