Automated Analysis of Spontaneous Facial Expression Variability in Neurocognitive Disorders During Naturalistic Conversation

在自然对话中,对神经认知障碍患者自发性面部表情变异性进行自动分析

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A comprehensive investigation of facial expression variability during naturalistic conversations was conducted across individuals with behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD), Alzheimer's disease (AD), mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and healthy controls (HC). To avoid questions of accuracy of individual emotion identification, this study primarily employed automated facial expression analysis to quantify expression variability and diversity during social interactions. METHODS: Participants engaged in 10‐minute recorded conversations about disagreements with family members, analyzed using a modified FER/MTCNN pipeline for facial expression detection. Emotional diversity was calculated using Simpson's Diversity Index, while dispersion measures captured variability in emotional intensities. RESULTS: Results revealed that bvFTD demonstrated significantly lower emotional diversity (mean = 0.59, SD=0.03) compared to both AD (mean = 0.65, SD=0.03; d=‐2.15, p <0.001) and HC (mean = 0.57, SD=0.07; d=‐1.38, p = 0.006). BvFTD exhibited higher happy dispersion (mean = 0.92, SD=0.13) compared to HC (mean = 0.80, SD=0.18; d=0.80, p = 0.026), MCI (mean = 0.67, SD=0.23; d=1.69, p = 0.012), and AD (mean = 0.71, SD=0.19; d=1.47, p = 0.003). Categorical analysis revealed significant differences between diagnostic groups (χ(2)=17.52, df=9, p = 0.041), with AD showing predominant “sad” expressions (87.5%), bvFTD displaying varied patterns (58.3% sad, 33.3% neutral), and HC demonstrating the most balanced distribution (43.8% neutral, 37.5% sad, 18.8% happy). MCI uniquely showed no predominant sad expressions, instead exhibiting mostly neutral expressions (60%) and equal proportions of happy and angry expressions (20% each). CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that automated facial expression analysis can detect meaningful patterns of emotional variability across neurodegenerative conditions, potentially aiding in diagnostic differentiation. Future research should address current limitations through larger sample sizes, manual validation, and longitudinal designs to track changes over time.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。