Surgical Management of Digital Neuromas: A Systematic Review of Techniques, Outcomes, and Pain Relief

指神经瘤的外科治疗:技术、结果和疼痛缓解的系统评价

阅读:2

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Painful digital neuromas are disorganized nerve proliferations that develop following traumatic or iatrogenic digital nerve injury, often resulting in debilitating allodynia, hypersensitivity, and impaired hand function. While conservative therapies such as desensitization, splinting, and pharmacological agents may offer temporary relief, over 50% of patients ultimately require surgical intervention. However, surgical strategies remain highly heterogeneous, and no consensus exists regarding the most effective operative technique. METHODS: A comprehensive search of 4 databases through May 2025 identified 30 studies encompassing over 600 adult patients who underwent surgical treatment for digital neuromas. Techniques assessed included neuroma excision with nerve stump transposition, direct end-to-end neurorrhaphy, nerve capping, regenerative peripheral nerve interface (RPNI) surgery, and targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) surgery. RESULTS: Excision with transposition relieved pain in up to 80% of cases but demonstrated inconsistent sensory recovery. Neurorrhaphy was associated with superior functional outcomes and a reduced recurrence rate. Nerve capping and polyglycolic acid-collagen conduits significantly improved pain scores and protective sensation. RPNI and TMR surgery, though reported in small series, provided over 80% pain relief with minimal complications. Meta-analysis was precluded by outcome heterogeneity. CONCLUSION: Surgical treatment of painful digital neuromas provides meaningful pain relief and functional improvement, particularly when techniques restore physiologic targets for regenerating axons rather than relying on excision alone. Continuity-restoring and reinnervation-based approaches, including neurorrhaphy, nerve capping, RPNI, and TMR, demonstrate favourable outcomes with lower recurrence rates, although comparative evidence remains limited. Standardised outcome measures and higher-quality comparative studies are required to guide optimal, patient-specific surgical decision-making.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。