The impact of androgen receptor pathway inhibitors as starting treatment in metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer on patient outcomes (OASIS Japan)

雄激素受体通路抑制剂作为转移性去势敏感性前列腺癌初始治疗对患者预后的影响(OASIS Japan)

阅读:1

Abstract

We examined the impact of starting treatment on clinical outcomes in men with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC). This retrospective observational cohort study used claims data from the Medical Data Vision (MDV) hospital-based administrative dataset in Japan. All patients with newly diagnosed mCSPC from 1 January 2018 to 31 March 2024 were enrolled and followed up until 30 September 2024. Time-to-event analyses used Kaplan-Meier methods. The risk of death, onset of castration resistance, time to ≥ 50% PSA decline (PSA50), ≥ 90% PSA decline (PSA90), and undetectable PSA level (≤ 0.2 ng/mL) was compared between androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPIs) and combined androgen blockade (CAB) or androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) alone using a Cox proportional hazard model adjusted for age, body mass index, co-morbidities, visceral metastases, and baseline PSA. 22,559 patients with mCSPC had received relevant treatment of whom 15,797 were included in the analysis: 1167 (5.2%) started on apalutamide (APA) + ADT, 1407 (6.2%) on enzalutamide + ADT, 1262 (5.6%) on abiraterone acetate plus prednisone + ADT, and 11,961 (53.0%) on CAB/ADT alone. The median age was between 74 and 78 years in each group. Bone metastases were present in 60.5% to 72.6% of patients, visceral metastases in 2.8% to 5.7%, and nodal metastases in 19.3% to 29.4%. Overall survival and castration resistance-free survival were significantly longer in patients initially treated with APA + ADT compared to CAB/ADT (p < 0.0001 for both comparisons). In patients with regular PSA assessment, a higher percentage of patients starting with APA + ADT achieved PSA50, PSA90 and undetectable PSA at 3 months compared with CAB/ADT (p < 0.0001, p = 0.0005, p < 0.0001, respectively). Use of APA + ADT as a starting treatment for mCSPC was associated with better clinical outcomes versus traditional CAB or ADT in real-world clinical practice in Japan.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。