The Moderating Role of Personality on the Effects of Concentration-, Ethics- and Wisdom-Based Meditation Practices for Well-Being and Prosociality

人格在基于专注力、伦理和智慧的冥想练习对幸福感和亲社会性的影响中的调节作用

阅读:1

Abstract

Objectives: The majority of mindfulness research has focused on group-level effects, with limited attention to how engagement with specific meditation practices interacts with individual differences such as personality. This study examined whether Big Five traits moderated the effects of two mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) on well-being and prosocial outcomes: one incorporating concentration- and ethics-based practices (MBI-CE) and another incorporating concentration-, ethics- and wisdom-based practices (MBI-CEW). Methods: Fifty-six participants were randomly assigned to MBI-CE (n = 21), MBI-CEW (n = 18), or a waitlist Control group (n = 17). Both interventions followed an 8-week programme. Pre- and post-intervention assessments measured changes in well-being and prosocial outcomes. Baseline personality traits were analysed as continuous variables using linear regression to test moderation effects, with ANCOVA sensitivity analyses conducted to assess robustness. Results: Participants high in neuroticism showed significantly greater prosocial gains under MBI-CEW compared to MBI-CE and Control (MBI-CEW × Neuroticism: β = 2.09, p = 0.021). High agreeableness moderated well-being outcomes for both interventions (MBI-CE: β = 1.873, p = 0.044; MBI-CEW: β = 2.701, p = 0.012), while high openness moderated well-being only for MBI-CEW (β = 2.478, p = 0.045). These findings suggest that the additional incorporation of wisdom-based practices (such as contemplations on interdependence and the emptiness of self), in combination with ethics-based practices, may enhance the prosocial effects of MBIs for individuals high in neuroticism, who are prone to interpersonal sensitivity and self-protective tendencies. Conclusions: Findings underscore the importance of moving beyond one-size-fits-all approaches to mindfulness. Tailoring MBIs to personality profiles, and integrating wisdom-based elements, in addition to ethics-based practices, may support more effective and sustainable outcomes in both clinical and non-clinical contexts.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。