Efficiency of Cephalic Vein Only Anastomosis During Radial Forearm Free Flap

桡前臂游离皮瓣手术中仅头静脉吻合的效率

阅读:1

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: The closure technique for the radial forearm free flap (RFFF), a commonly utilized flap in head and neck reconstruction, remains a debated topic as there are unique advantages and drawbacks to each technique. OBJECTIVE: The present study aims to report on the outcomes of the closure of the RFFF with the superficial cephalic vein (CV)-only system in terms of venous compromise and flap survival. METHODS (DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, INTERVENTION, MEASURES): A retrospective review of patients who underwent head and neck reconstruction with RFFF between January 2015 and May 2021 at the authors' institution was performed. Cases were categorized as superficial, dual, and deep systems. Multiple population and operative variables were collected for the study group. RESULTS: In total, 221 cases of RFFF were included, of which 169 (76.5%) cases were performed using the CV alone, whereas the remaining 52 (22.5%) cases utilized either the dual or the deep system alone. The operative time in the superficial group was 265 minutes. There were 9 venous complications in the CV group, of which 5 required re-exploration in the operating room and 4 were treated conservatively. All venous-related flap complications were salvaged. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: A majority of the RFFF cases could successfully be completed using the CV as the sole venous drainage, with high rates of flap survival, low complications, and low operative time.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。