Refractive error and angle of deviation in basic esotropia versus exotropia: a comparative study

内斜视与外斜视的屈光不正和偏斜角度:一项比较研究

阅读:1

Abstract

AIM: To compare refractive error and angle of deviation in patients with basic esotropia and basic exotropia. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted on the medical records of patients with basic-type strabismus. Demographic data, refractive error, best-corrected distance visual acuity (BCVA), and the horizontal and vertical angle of deviation between basic esotropia and exotropia patients were compared. RESULTS: Among the 7129 patients (mean age 22.98±14.81y) evaluated, 44.7% (3185 cases, 54.9% male) exhibited basic-type esotropia, while 55.3% (3944 cases, 53.9% male) presented with basic-type exotropia. Basic esotropia cases exhibited more hyperopic spherical equivalent measurements in both eyes (right: 0.53±3.07 vs left: 0.56±2.98 D) than those with basic exotropia (right eye: -0.33±2.84 vs left eye: -0.24±2.68 D, P<0.001 for both eyes). Patients with basic esotropia had significantly greater horizontal deviation angles (near: 36.08±18.87 PD and far: 35.56±18.75 PD) compared to those with basic exotropia (near: 33.75±16.11 PD and far: 33.26±15.90 PD, P<0.001). Conversely, patients with basic exotropia had slightly higher vertical deviation angles (near: 1.67±5.80 PD and far: 1.72±5.89 PD) compared to those with basic esotropia (near: 1.12±4.57 PD and far: 1.12±4.58 PD, P<0.001). Patients with basic esotropia underwent surgical intervention at younger ages compared to basic exotropia individuals (19.68±15.99 vs 25.66±13.20, P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Basic esotropia patients present more hyperopic refractive errors, better visual acuity, larger horizontal yet smaller vertical ocular misalignments, and tend to undergo strabismus surgery at younger ages relative to basic exotropia cases.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。