Abstract
Wetland loss and human activities are forcing migratory waterbirds to rely on alternative habitats such as croplands, yet their adaptive habitat use across contrasting landscape contexts remains unclear. The Bar-headed Goose (Anser indicus) is a key indicator species in the wetland ecosystems of the Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau. Comparing differences in its wintering habitat selection and utilization is of great significance for understanding its ecological adaptation mechanisms and formulating regional wetland conservation strategies. In this study, we compared the diurnal habitat use during the wintering period of Bar-headed Geese at three wetlands (Nianhu, Caohai, and Napahai) representing distinct landscape contexts. We used GPS satellite tracking and dynamic Brownian bridge movement modeling, combined with random forest analysis of environmental variables, to quantify diurnal habitat use and selection at each site. Our results revealed significant regional differences in habitat use. In the agriculture-dominated wetlands (Nianhu and Caohai), geese primarily utilized cropland and marsh habitats (Nianhu: cropland 45.88% ± 30.70%, marsh 42.55% ± 33.17%; Caohai: cropland 62.33% ± 12.16%, marsh 28.61% ± 13.62%). In contrast, at Napahai, which is dominated by natural habitats, geese primarily used grassland (65.92% ± 20.01%) and marsh (26.85% ± 21.88%), with minimal use of cropland (4.21% ± 7.00%). Diurnal habitat selection was influenced by multiple environmental factors, with distinct regional differences identified through random forest modeling. In Nianhu, key factors included distance to supplemental feeding site, distance to grassland, distance to woodland, and distance to open water. In Caohai, distance to grassland, distance to nocturnal roost site, distance to settlement, and distance to open water were significant drivers. In Napahai, distance to nocturnal roost site, distance to open water, and distance to marsh were the most influential (all with p < 0.01), reflecting flexible behavioral responses. Based on these findings, we recommend region-specific conservation management strategies. Specifically, supplemental feeding at Nianhu should be strictly regulated. Agricultural planning in farming areas should account for the habitat needs of wintering waterbirds. Grassland and marsh habitats at Napahai should also be more effectively protected.