Evaluating Pedicled Groin Flap Reconstruction in Hand Degloving Injuries: A Retrospective Analysis

评估带蒂腹股沟皮瓣重建术在手部脱套伤中的应用:一项回顾性分析

阅读:1

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of pedicled groin flap coverage in such injuries and identify factors associated with postoperative complications and flap viability. METHODS: A retrospective review of 23 patients who underwent pedicled groin flap reconstruction for finger or hand degloving injuries between 2015 and 2024 was conducted. Patient demographics, surgical details, complication rates, aesthetic outcomes, and functional recovery were analyzed. RESULTS: The cohort had a mean age of 27.9 years, with a male predominance (73.9%) and a high smoking rate (73.9%). Most defects involved the fingers (87%), with a mean defect size of 30.6 cm(2) and a mean flap size of 72.0 cm(2). The mean wound healing time was 32.5 days, and the average hospital stay was 3.6 days. Flap success was achieved in 91.3% of the cases. Postoperative complications occurred in 34.8% of the patients, including partial flap necrosis (26.1%), wound dehiscence (13.0%), and infection (4.3%). Intraoperative venous congestion was observed in 39.1% of the cases and was more frequent among patients who developed complications (P = .001). Other variables showing statistically significant differences between patients with and without complications included smoking status (P = .037), additional procedures performed (P = .037), and smaller defect dimensions (P = .011 for width; P = .032 for size). Aesthetic outcomes were rated as good or neutral in over 90% of the cases. Functionally, 91.3% of the patients experienced minimal-to-mild disability, with a mean QuickDASH score of 18.1 (SD = 14.1). Patients with complications had higher disability scores (mean: 27.9 vs 12.9; P = .012). CONCLUSIONS: Groin flap reconstruction remains a reliable and accessible option for managing hand degloving injuries, particularly in resource-limited settings, offering acceptable functional and aesthetic outcomes despite a relatively high rate of secondary procedures. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic III.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。