Comparison of efficacy and safety of first-line immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer, a retrospective study

一线免疫疗法联合化疗治疗广泛期小细胞肺癌的疗效和安全性比较:一项回顾性研究

阅读:1

Abstract

Immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 axis, in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy, have become the standard first-line treatment for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). Among these agents, serplulimab is a PD-1 inhibitor, while adebrelimab, durvalumab, and atezolizumab are PD-L1 inhibitors, all of which have been integrated into clinical practice based on emerging evidence. However, the comparative efficacy of these combined therapies remains unclear. This study aims to compare the efficacy of Serplulimab, Adebrelimab, Durvalumab, and Atezolizumab when combined with chemotherapy, providing real-world data on their clinical benefits in ES-SCLC. This retrospective study included 322 patients diagnosed with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) who received first-line treatment with platinum-based chemotherapy combined with a PD-1 or PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibitor between March 2019 and December 2023. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS)and progression-free survival (PFS). A total of 322 patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) were enrolled in this study. All patients received chemotherapy in combination with one of the following PD-L1 inhibitors: Adebrelimab (n = 71), Serplulimab (n = 80), Durvalumab (n = 93), or Atezolizumab (n = 78).The median PFS was 7.63 months (95% CI 6.57–8.77) for Atezolizumab, 6.9 months (95% CI 5.67–8.57) for Serplulimab, 7.43 months (95% CI 6.3–9.43) for Durvalumab, and 7.4 months (95% CI 6.3–9.43) for Adebrelimab. No significant differences in PFS were observed between Serplulimab and the other PD-L1 inhibitors, with p values of 0.96 for Adebrelimab, 0.8 for Atezolizumab, and 0.44 for Durvalumab.The median OS was 17.2 months (95% CI 13.3–27.7) for Atezolizumab, 15.0 months (95% CI 12.8–NA) for Serplulimab, 17.6 months (95% CI 16.2–26.6) for Durvalumab, and 23.2 months (95% CI 23.1–NA) for Adebrelimab. No significant differences in OS were observed between Serplulimab and either Durvalumab (p = 0.23) or Atezolizumab (p = 0.61). However, Adebrelimab was associated with a significantly longer OS compared to Serplulimab (p = 0.029). Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that liver metastasis was an independent adverse prognostic factor for both PFS and OS. The combination of chemotherapy with PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors, including Serplulimab, Adebrelimab, Durvalumab, and Atezolizumab, demonstrates comparable efficacy regarding PFS. However, Adebrelimab provides a significantly better long-term survival benefit, indicating its potential as a superior treatment option for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-025-23874-3.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。