Efficacy and safety of two-year fixed versus continuous immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review

晚期或转移性非小细胞肺癌患者接受两年固定疗程与持续免疫检查点抑制剂治疗的疗效和安全性:系统评价

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The optimal duration of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy in advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (amNSCLC) is unknown. Most trials either continued ICI indefinitely or electively stopped at two years if no progressive disease (PD) or treatment-limiting immune-related adverse events (irAEs) emerged. METHODS: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and real-world evidence studies (RWEs) was performed for adults with amNSCLC treated with ICI therapy up to August 24, 2024. Patients were divided into two cohorts: a 2 year fixed cohort in which ICI therapy was discontinued after 2 years and a continuous therapy cohort in which ICI therapy was continued beyond 2 years. RESULTS: Twenty studies and 5027 patients were included. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rates of the two-year fixed cohorts ranged from 69 to 83% across studies and were comparable to continuous therapy cohorts. Four RWEs compared survival outcomes between 2 year fixed and continuous cohorts and found no difference. Patients who completed 2 years of therapy in RCTs tended to have greater rates of irAEs compared to the baseline RCT population. Three RWEs reported higher rates of irAEs in the continuous versus two-year fixed cohorts. Many patients who developed PD after the two-year mark in both cohorts remained alive at the data cutoff. Larger/academic centers favored two-year fixed therapy compared with community centers. CONCLUSION: Survival outcomes after ICI discontinuation at 2 years are comparable to continuous therapy in amNSCLC. IrAEs tend to accumulate over time.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。