Abstract
The concept of "material effort" appears in continuum mechanics wherever the response of a material to the currently existing state of loads and boundary conditions loses its previous, predictable character. However, within the material, which still descriptively remains a continuous medium, new physical structures appear and new previously unused physical features of the continuum are activated. The literature is dominated by a simplified way of thinking, which assumes that all these states can be characterized and described by one and the same measure of effort-for metals it is the Huber-Mises-Hencky equivalent stress. Quantitatively, perhaps 90% of the literature is dedicated to this equivalent stress. The remaining authors, as well as the author of this paper, assume that there is no single universal measure of effort that would "fit" all operating conditions of materials. Each state of the structure's operation may have its own autonomous measure of effort, which expresses the degree of threat from a specific destruction mechanism. In the current energy sector, we are increasingly dealing with "low-cycle thermal fatigue states". This is related to the fact that large, difficult-to-predict renewable energy sources have been added. Professional energy based on coal and gas units must perform many (even about 100 per year) starts and stops, and this applies not only to the hot state, but often also to the cold state. The question arises as to the allowable shortening of start and stop times that would not to lead to dangerous material effort, and whether there are necessary data and strength characteristics for heat-resistant steels that allow their effort to be determined not only in simple states, but also in complex stress states. Do these data allow for the description of the material's yield surface? In a previous publication, the author presented the results of tension and compression tests at elevated temperatures for two heat-resistant steels: St12T and 26H2MF. The aim of the current work is to determine the properties and strength characteristics of these steels in a pure torsion test at elevated temperatures. This allows for the analysis of the strength of power turbine components operating primarily on torsion and for determining which of the two tested steels is more resistant to high temperatures. In addition, the properties determined in all three tests (tension, compression, torsion) will allow the determination of the yield surface of these steels at elevated temperatures. They are necessary for the strength analysis of turbine elements in start-up and shutdown cycles, in states changing from cold to hot and vice versa. A modified testing machine was used for pure torsion tests. It allowed for the determination of the sample's torsion moment as a function of its torsion angle. The experiments were carried out at temperatures of 20 °C, 200 °C, 400 °C, 600 °C, and 800 °C for St12T steel and at temperatures of 20 °C, 200 °C, 400 °C, 550 °C, and 800 °C for 26H2MF steel. Characteristics were drawn up for each sample and compared on a common graph corresponding to the given steel. Based on the methods and relationships from the theory of strength, the yield stress and torsional strength were determined. The yield stress of St12T steel at 600 °C was 319.3 MPa and the torsional strength was 394.4 MPa. For 26H2MH steel at 550 °C, the yield stress was 311.4 and the torsional strength was 382.8 MPa. St12T steel was therefore more resistant to high temperatures than 26H2MF. The combined data from the tension, compression, and torsion tests allowed us to determine the asymmetry and plasticity coefficients, which allowed us to model the yield surface according to the Burzyński criterion as a function of temperature. The obtained results also allowed us to determine the parameters of the Drucker-Prager model and two of the three parameters of the Willam-Warnke and Menetrey-Willam models. The research results are a valuable contribution to the design and diagnostics of power turbine components.