Posterior pericardiotomy: An effective strategy for reducing post-coronary artery bypass grafting complications, with considerations for pleural effusion risk

后心包切开术:一种降低冠状动脉旁路移植术后并发症的有效策略,需考虑胸腔积液风险。

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Postoperative complications such as atrial fibrillation and pericardial effusion are frequent after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), contributing to increased morbidity and prolonged hospital stays. Posterior pericardiotomy (PP), a surgical technique involving incision of the posterior pericardium to allow drainage, has been suggested as a preventive measure. However, its overall efficacy and safety profile, including potential risks like pleural effusion, require comprehensive evaluation amid varying study qualities. We hypothesized that PP reduces key post-CABG complications compared to standard care. AIM: To determine the efficacy of PP in reducing postoperative complications following CABG. METHODS: This systematic review and meta-analysis included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from PubMed, Cochrane, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Ovid, comparing PP vs no PP in adult CABG patients. Studies were conducted in tertiary care hospital settings. Twenty RCTs with 5331 participants were selected based on predefined inclusion criteria. The intervention involved intraoperative PP. Primary outcome was postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF); secondary outcomes included effusions, tamponade, hospital/intensive care unit stay, and bleeding revisions. Risk ratios (RRs), mean differences, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random-effects models; heterogeneity assessed via I (2) statistic. RESULTS: Twenty RCTs analyzed 5331 patients (2665 with PP vs 2666 without). PP significantly lowered POAF (10% vs 21%; RR = 0.48, 95%CI: 0.36-0.65, P < 0.00001; I (2) = 70%), cardiac tamponade (0.5% vs 3%; RR = 0.16, 95%CI: 0.08-0.34, P < 0.00001; I (2) = 0%), early pericardial effusion (2% vs 6%; RR = 0.31, 95%CI: 0.14-0.68, P = 0.004; I (2) = 96%), and late pericardial effusion (1% vs 9%; RR = 0.11, 95%CI: 0.05-0.21, P < 0.00001; I (2) = 0%). Hospital stay decreased (mean difference = -1.23 days, 95%CI: -1.87 to -0.59, P = 0.0002; I (2) = 85%). Pleural effusion risk increased (25% vs 17%; RR = 1.46, 95%CI: 1.21-1.76, P < 0.0001; I (2) = 0%). No significant effects on mortality (RR = 0.92, 95%CI: 0.48-1.76, P = 0.80; I (2) = 0%), intensive care unit stay, or bleeding revisions. CONCLUSION: PP effectively reduces POAF, pericardial effusions, tamponade, and hospital stay in CABG patients, though it increases pleural effusion risk and shows heterogeneity in some outcomes.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。