Restrictive and Binge-Purge OSFED Variants: Clinical Features and Comparisons With Classical Eating Disorders

限制型和暴食-清除型其他特定进食障碍:临床特征及与经典进食障碍的比较

阅读:1

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Current diagnostic nomenclature includes "atypical" eating disorders (EDs) under the term other specified feeding or eating disorder (OSFED). Previous studies suggest that individuals with OSFED have similar psychological and concurrent symptoms to individuals with "classical" EDs. Our study compared people with OSFED to those with classical EDs on indices reflecting ED pathology, concurrent psychological symptoms, personality traits, functional impairment, illness duration, and pretreatment motivation. We also compared OSFED variants characterized solely by restrictive eating behaviors (OSFED-R) to variants in which binge-eating and/or purging symptoms predominated (OSFED-B/P). METHODS: Participants were 836 treatment-seeking adults (185 AN-Restricting type [AN-R], 165 AN Binge-eating/purging type [AN-B/P], 276 BN, 104 OSFED-R, and 106 OSFED-B/P) starting outpatient ED treatment. Data were analyzed with generalized linear models. RESULTS: Overall, findings in individuals with OSFED were comparable to those in people with a "classical" ED diagnosis on self-reported measures of concurrent psychological symptoms, personality traits, functional impairment, illness duration, and treatment motivation. However, relative to people with AN-R, individuals with OSFED-R reported higher levels of psychological ED symptoms (p < 0.001). The OSFED-B/P group had even more ED-related psychological symptoms than did the OSFED-R group (p = 0.02), but did not differ from the AN-B/P and BN groups on any of our indices. DISCUSSION: Findings extend previous research, underscoring the point that OSFED syndromes have serious clinical implications, comparable to those associated with full-threshold AN and BN. Results also highlight the relevance of examining heterogeneity within the OSFED category in function of a restrictive vs. binge/purge distinction.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。