How Ambivalence Toward Digital-AI Transformation Affects Taking-Charge Behavior: A Threat-Rigidity Theoretical Perspective

对数字化人工智能转型的矛盾心理如何影响主动行为:基于威胁-僵化理论的视角

阅读:1

Abstract

Digital-AI transformation is revolutionizing the modern workplace, yet its complexity has left many aspects of employee responses underexplored. While previous research has examined some employee reactions to technological change, the nuanced impact of ambivalence toward digital-AI transformation on employees' proactive behavior remains a largely uncharted area. This is especially significant as proactive behavior is crucial for the successful implementation of digital-AI transformation. While presenting unprecedented opportunities, digital-AI transformation has also triggered intricate psychological responses among employees, with ambivalence toward it being particularly prominent. Building on threat-rigidity theory, this study aims to fill a research gap by exploring the impact of ambivalence on employees' proactive behavior during digital-AI transformation. Using survey data collected from 343 employees undergoing digital-AI transformation, we tested a structural model linking ambivalence, job engagement, and future work self-salience to taking-charge behavior. The results reveal that ambivalence toward digital-AI transformation negatively affects taking-charge behavior. Furthermore, both future work self-salience and job engagement fully mediate this relationship. Additionally, job engagement and future work self-salience jointly play a chained mediating role in the negative effect of ambivalence toward digital-AI transformation on taking-charge behavior. Our findings provide actionable insights for organizations seeking to mitigate ambivalence and foster proactive employee engagement in digital transformation initiatives.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。