Is Consolidation Therapy Effective in Multiple Myeloma Patients after High-Dose Chemotherapy and Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation: Single Center Real-Life Data with Cyclophosphamide-Bortezomib-Dexamethasone or Bortezomib-Lenalidomide-Dexamethasone?

大剂量化疗和自体干细胞移植后,巩固治疗对多发性骨髓瘤患者是否有效:环磷酰胺-硼替佐米-地塞米松或硼替佐米-来那度胺-地塞米松的单中心真实世界数据?

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: An induction regimen, followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) and subsequent maintenance therapy, is a standard practice for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) who are eligible for transplantation. The effectiveness of short-term consolidation regimens following ASCT remains ambiguous and is not yet incorporated into MM guidelines. METHODS: This study consecutively enrolled patients with MM who had a bortezomib-based induction regimen prior to ASCT. A total of one hundred twelve patients who achieved at least a partial response at two months post-autologous stem cell transplantation were studied [median age: 59 (30-74) years; male/female ratio: 60/52]. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients did not undergo any consolidation, whereas eighty-seven patients got a median of 2 cycles (range: 1-6) of cyclophosphamide-bortezomib-dexamethasone (CyBorD) for Bortezomib-Lenalidomide-Dexamethasone (VRD) consolidation following ASCT. Progression-free survival (PFS) in the overall trial cohort was longer in patients receiving consolidation therapy (57 months versus 44 months, p = 0.06). Among patients exhibiting a very good partial response (VGPR) or partial response (PR) to ASCT, PFS was markedly prolonged in those who underwent consolidation cycles compared to those who did not (57 vs. 12 months; p = 0.04). Conversely, in the stringent complete remission (sCR) or complete remission (CR) cohort, PFS did not differ between patients who received consolidation cycles and those who did not. The analysis revealed no statistically significant differences in overall survival (OS) between the two answer category groups (p > 0.05). The PFS (p > 0.05) and incidence of severe toxicity (p > 0.05) were comparable for patients receiving CyBorD and VRD consolidation regimens. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated that consolidation therapy is safe regarding its adverse effect profile, and that its beneficial impact on PFS in first-line treatment is particularly evident in patients exhibiting VGPR and PR to ASCT.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。