Carbon capture and utilization from an ethylene oxide plant for sustainable urea production: techno-economic assessment

利用环氧乙烷装置中的碳捕获和利用技术实现可持续尿素生产:技术经济评估

阅读:1

Abstract

It is essential to establish a carbon dioxide (CO(2)) capturing unit for recycling and repurposing CO(2) that is released into the atmosphere in the petroleum refinery and petrochemical plants. This will reduce the environmental impact of these processes and create additional value. The present study investigates two possible pathways for carbon capture from an ethylene oxide (EO) production plant for utilization in a urea plant. The simulation of the proposed processes was carried out using Aspen Plus software, and the optimization of the transportation pipeline was performed using Matlab and Aspen Hysys software. Two different scenarios were investigated for the removal of water from CO(2). In the first scenario, a two-phase separator was utilized to separate the accompanying water from CO(2), whereas the second scenario incorporated a reactive distillation tower (RD). The proposed scenarios were evaluated and compared from technical, economical, and environmental perspectives. The results obtained from the simulation showed that the second method eliminated the risk of corrosion in gas transmission pipeline by implementing a RD tower, which converts accompanying water into ethylene glycol (EG) through a reaction with ethylene oxide. Therefore, the gas transmission pipeline material could be carbon steel instead of stainless-steel, that was the case for the first scenario. On the other hand, the first method had lower energy consumption, resulting in 37% lower CO(2) emissions compared to the second method. Furthermore, the total operating cost (TOC), total capital cost (TCC), and total annual cost (TAC) associated with the separation of accompanying water and transportation pipeline were evaluated for each scenario. The revenue from ethylene glycol production in the second scenario was also calculated. In summary, the results indicated that the second scenario outperforms the first scenario from the economic viewpoint. In contrast, the first scenario is more environmentally favorable in terms of CO(2) emissions.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。