Abstract
BackgroundThere has been a recent increase in the publication of articles evaluating outcomes of balloon dilation of the eustachian tube (BDET) as a treatment for chronic eustachian tube dysfunction (ETD). Our objective was to evaluate the overall efficacy of BDET for treating ETD, with a subgroup analysis of BDET performed under local anesthesia (LA) versus general anesthesia.MethodsPUBMED, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched for English articles from January 2010 to October 2025. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines were followed. Only randomized controlled trials and prospective studies evaluating BDET for ETD were included. All articles evaluating BDET performed under LA were assessed.ResultsOur search identified a total of 23 articles after screening (365 articles). Only studies using homogeneous and validated outcome measures were included. A total of 6 studies met criteria for meta-analysis of preoperative and postoperative outcomes of BDET as assessed by the ETD Questionnaire (ETDQ-7). Other reported parameters include LA protocols and surgical complications. Seven studies used LA protocols. A meta-analysis using the random effects model demonstrated a decrease in mean ETDQ-7 scores by 2.03 up to a year following BDET (309 patients, CI -2.59 to -1.47, P < .001). Descriptive statistics were used to analyze studies where BDET was performed under LA due to outcome heterogeneity. The results demonstrate no significant differences in otologic post-BDET outcomes (tympanometry/ETDQ-7 scores), minimal complications, and high patient-reported willingness to choose LA.ConclusionsBDET is effective for treating chronic ETD. BDET performed under LA with careful patient selection and an established LA protocol is safe and comparable to BDET in the operating room.