Inclusive legal education as an upstream intervention: building legal governance and capacity for health equity

包容性法律教育作为上游干预措施:构建促进健康公平的法律治理和能力

阅读:1

Abstract

Achieving health equity requires attention not only to healthcare access and the social determinants of health, but also to the governance capacity of institutions that shape health-related policies and legal frameworks. This study explores inclusive legal education as a potential upstream intervention for building health governance capacity, focusing on how barriers in legal professional training may indirectly connect to the health equity agenda. Through a secondary qualitative analysis of publicly available narrative texts and official documents concerning 14 Chinese legal professionals with disabilities, this study identified three interconnected dimensions. First, these public narratives reveal that institutional environments reflecting tendencies that disability scholars characterize as ableism generate discernible barriers in legal education and professional entry pathways, barriers that could intersect with broader patterns of socioeconomic stratification recognized as social determinants of health outcomes. Second, while informal social capital serves compensatory functions when formal support systems remain underdeveloped, this reliance may inadvertently create filtering mechanisms that narrow the range of perspectives available for health policy formulation. Third, public narratives indicate that some individuals exhibit transformative agency, leveraging their legal professional identities to advocate for institutional improvement in ways that may be understood as a form of empowered social participation in health governance. These findings advance a conceptual argument: promoting inclusivity in legal education may constitute upstream capacity-building for health equity. By expanding professional diversity within legal systems, such reform may contribute to governance institutions' capacity to develop more inclusive health policies and anti-discrimination frameworks. This research offers a conceptual framework and preliminary theoretical grounding for understanding how capacity building, social participation, and empowerment in legal education reform may conceptually connect to the broader health equity agenda.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。