Will diabetes mellitus induce aplastic anemia by immune factors?: A two-sample and mediation Mendelian randomization study

糖尿病是否会通过免疫因素诱发再生障碍性贫血?:一项双样本和中介孟德尔随机化研究

阅读:1

Abstract

Diabetes is a prevalent global metabolic and endocrine disorder that is associated with a high incidence of complications and organ system dysfunction. Bone marrow (BM) as a previously neglected site of diabetic end-organ damage, characterized by microangiopathy, neuropathy, fat deposition, and inflammation. As a result, diabetes may lead to negative consequences for physiologic hematopoiesis, which may increase the risk of aplastic anemia (AA). Summary genetic data for diabetes mellitus (DM) were sourced from FinnGen; while the data for AA and immune cell traits were obtained from the IEU Open GWAS database. We performed a two-sample univariable Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis to investigate the causal effects of DM on AA. Simultaneously, multivariable MR was utilized to further estimate the direct effect of subgroup (distinct types) of diabetes on AA. Then, a two-step mediation MR analysis was conducted to examine 731 immune cell traits that may mediate these effects. Several methods were used to evaluate the robustness of the results, including sensitivity analyses with Cochran Q statistic, MR-Egger and MR-PRESSO, which also help mitigate potential bias from horizontal pleiotropy. The two-sample univariate MR analysis demonstrated DM was significantly and positively linked to the incidence of AA (IVW, OR = 1.12; 95% CI: 1.05-1.95; P = 5.11e-04), which was comparable to the direct effect estimated for type 2 diabetes on AA risk in multivariable MR (multivariable IVW, OR = 1.18; 95% CI: 1.03-1.35; P = 1.96e-02). In two-step mediation MR, we explored 54 immune cell traits associated with DM, among these, only the Resting CD4 + regulatory T cell absolute count emerged as a potential mediator influencing the risk of AA, accounting for 10.64% of the effect. We found robust genetic evidence for a causal association between DM and AA risk, and rest CD4+ Treg absolute count, might mediate this effect. However, the potential implications of our findings for AA prevention require validation through well-powered randomized clinical trials.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。