P-435. Utility of Second Sample Testing in Indian Children Suffering from Tuberculosis with Rifampicin Indeterminate Results on Xpert MTB/Rif and Xpert Ultra Assays

P-435. 对使用利福平治疗结核病的印度儿童进行二次样本检测,若Xpert MTB/Rif和Xpert Ultra检测结果不确定,则需进行二次样本检测。

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Nucleic acid amplification tests (NAAT) for tuberculosis(TB) such as Xpert MTB/Rif and Xpert Ultra, can rapidly detect Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) and rifampicin resistance (RR). However, they may yield rifampicin indeterminate (RI) results which pose a significant challenge. Current guidelines suggest performing NAAT on a second sample and treating with first-line antitubercular therapy (ATT) until actionable results are obtained on NAAT or other drug-resistance assays. The aim of this study is to determine the detection yield, rifampicin resistance results, and clinical implications of second sample testing on NAAT in patients with first sample RI results. [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted including all pediatric TB patients with RI results on their first sample NAAT. Data on specimen type, and second sample NAAT results was analysed. [Figure: see text] RESULTS: One-hundred and sixteen patients were included. Second sample testing was done in 95 (81.90%) patients, of which 67 (70.5%) samples were pulmonary and 28 (29.5%) samples were extrapulmonary. For pulmonary samples, 10 (14.93%) detected MTB, of which 2 (20%) were RI, 6 (60%) were rifampicin sensitive (RS) and 2 (20%) were RR. For extrapulmonary samples, 14 (50%) detected MTB, of which only 1 (7.14%) was RI, 8 (57.14%) were RS, and 5 (35.71%) were RR. On second sample testing, the rates of RR for lymph nodes and tissue samples was 33.33% and 50%, respectively. Eighty-one (69.83%) patients solely received first-line ATT, 7 (6.03%) patients solely received second-line ATT, and 28 (24.14%) patients received both. Of these 28 patients, 20 (71.43%) patients had initially received first-line and were shifted onto second line while 8(28.57%) patients received concurrent first- and second-line ATT. CONCLUSION: Repeat pulmonary sample testing in patients with RI results on first sample are less likely to detect MTB and are more likely to be RS, thus, patients may be empirically treated with first-line ATT if a second sample cannot be collected. Repeat extrapulmonary sample testing in patients with RI results on first sample are likely to detect MTB, have actionable results on NAAT, and may have RR results. Thus, collecting a second extrapulmonary sample, particularly lymph nodes and tissues, should be done in those in whom it is feasible. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。