Exposure to the Four First-Line Anti-Tuberculosis Drugs and Treatment Outcomes: A Target Trial Emulation Study in Ghana

接触四种一线抗结核药物及治疗结果:加纳的一项Target试验模拟研究

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Tuberculosis (TB) treatment outcomes in sub-Saharan Africa remain suboptimal despite high adherence to first-line therapy. Variability in drug pharmacokinetics, resulting in subtherapeutic plasma concentrations, may contribute to treatment failure and the development of resistance. This study estimated the causal effect of subtherapeutic plasma concentrations of first-line anti-TB drugs on treatment failure or death among individuals with drug-susceptible pulmonary TB in Ghana. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study of 164 adults receiving standard WHO weight-band dosing at five Ghanaian hospitals. Peak plasma concentrations (C(max)) of rifampicin, isoniazid, pyrazinamide, and ethambutol were measured at months 1-2 using validated LC-MS/MS. We emulated a target trial comparing two static strategies: (1) therapeutic C(max) of at least one first-line drug versus (2) subtherapeutic C(max) of all four drugs. Using the clone-censor-weight approach, we estimated the per-protocol analogue risk difference (RD) and risk ratio (RR) for treatment failure (smear positive at months 5 or 6) or death by month 6. Models were adjusted for baseline covariates using inverse probability of censoring weighting. Sensitivity analyses included inverse probability weighting with regression adjustment, plain inverse probability weighting, and E-values. RESULTS: Of 164 participants, 120 had complete pharmacokinetic and outcome data; 20.0% (24/120) had subtherapeutic concentrations of all four drugs. The 6-month risk of treatment failure or death was 33.3% under the low-exposure strategy versus 4.2% under the adequate-exposure strategy (crude RD: 29.1 percentage points). In weighted analyses, low drug exposure was associated with a 25.6 percentage-point increase in absolute risk of treatment failure or death (95% CI: 5.7-45.6; p = 0.012) and an 8.6-fold higher relative risk (95% CI: 2.34-31.92; p = 0.001), corresponding to approximately one additional poor outcome for every four patients with subtherapeutic levels. Sensitivity analyses were consistent (ATE: 19.9%, 95% CI: 2.3-37.5). The E-value was 15.5 (lower bound 5.0). CONCLUSIONS: Subtherapeutic exposure to all four first-line drugs was strongly associated with increased risk of treatment failure or death. Preventing multidrug subtherapeutic exposure through therapeutic drug monitoring or optimized dosing warrants randomized evaluation in high-burden settings. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical trial number: not applicable.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。