Abstract
The jaw bones can manifest various cysts and tumors of different origins and etiologies. Any bone lesions lacking any potential odontogenic origin might require more accurate diagnostics, adequate investigation, and careful patient anamnesis. In cases of sharply demarcated radiolucency or mixed radiolucent-radiopaque radiological appearance lesions, they can sometimes extend between the displaced tooth roots or cause their resorption. The scope of cortical bone in radiographic studies might have a different status, and lesions can spread outside of the bone. If no odontogenic feature is present, an additional blood examination for bone markers and calcium-phosphate markers is useful to establish any endocrine-related pathologies. In the primary hyperparathyroidism (PHP), bone blood markers and bone scintigraphy are very useful to establish the possible occurrence of brown tumor. On the other hand, in central giant cell granuloma (CGCG), only a direct tumor lesion biopsy might confirm the diagnosis, where in microscopic evaluation, mostly fibroblasts and secondary cells have multinucleated giant cells along with some accessory cells like macrophages, dendrocytes, and other endothelial cells. Because both lesions can have similar clinical and radiological appearances and unclear borders, with different shapes, sizes, and symptoms, it is quite important to compare both clinical and radiological patient characteristics. The authors aim to present how radiological studies alone can easily lead to lesion misdiagnosis. They also aim to emphasize how local treatment methods without advanced microsurgical reconstruction can, in some cases, improve patient outcomes.