Comparative evaluation of pattern and distribution of stresses in single- and double-implant overdenture using ball-ring, positioner, and magnet-keeper attachment under different loading conditions: A finite element analysis

不同载荷条件下,采用球环式、定位器式和磁力保持式附件的单种植体和双种植体覆盖义齿应力模式和分布的比较评价:有限元分析

阅读:1

Abstract

AIM: The aim is to evaluate and compare stress distribution characteristics of ball, magnet, and positioned attachment systems in single and double implant-retained overdentures using the finite element method (FEM). SETTING AND DESIGN: In vitro (in silico study) finite element analysis (FEA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A Styrofoam mandible with duplicated silicon mucosa was used to construct a mandibular complete denture. Implants of size 12 mm by 3.4 mm body diameter (Implantium, Dentium, Korea) were used along with ball O-ring, positioner, and magnet attachment system for constructing single and double implant overdenture. FEA models were processed defining geometry. Six models were formulated, namely, three models of central single implant and three for double implant overdenture using ball O-ring attachment, positioner attachment, and magnet attachment named B1, P1, M1, B2, P2, and M2, respectively. The FEM analysis was done using ANSYS workbench 16.0. A load of around 100N was applied bilaterally in the first molar regions, anteriorly between the two central incisors, and unilaterally on the right first molar region. Stresses were calculated according to the Von Mises stresses scale. Stress magnitude and patterns were analyzed and interpreted accordingly. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Stress patterns and maximum principal stress were described. RESULTS: FEM analysis revealed that stress concentration in the B1 model was the highest. Anterior loading produced maximum stress followed by unilateral and lastly bilateral loading. In the bone, stress concentration was the highest in the crestal bone region (3-18 MPa). Mucosa showed the least amount of stress in all models (1.3-3 MPa). Stress patterns in dentures were symmetric with concentration on the mid-lingual and molar premolar area (3-18 MPa). Implants showed stress concentration near the collar and the internal connection region (7.5-24 MPa). Maximum stresses were around the head of prosthetic abutments (10.5-24 MPa). The stress concentration in the ball head was typically located in the abutment neck. In positioner attachment, stress was located in the inner open end area (11-20.1 MPa). For the keeper, stresses were at its base and stress patterns extended into the body (10.5-17.7 MPa). Less stress magnitude was seen for all models on bilateral loading (10.5-15 MPa). CONCLUSION: Magnet and positioner attachments have a more favorable stress distribution in both single and double implant-retained overdentures. Bilateral loading conditions are more favorable for uniform stress patterns.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。