Assessment of Immediate versus Delayed Loading Protocols in Single Tooth Anterior Implants

单颗前牙种植体即刻负重与延期负重方案的评估

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The timing of prosthetic loading plays a critical role in the long-term success of dental implants. In anterior maxillary regions, both functional and aesthetic outcomes are vital, and clinicians often debate between immediate and delayed loading protocols. METHODS: A prospective, randomized clinical trial was conducted on 40 patients (20 per group) requiring single anterior maxillary implants. Group A underwent immediate loading within 48 h post-implant placement, while Group B underwent delayed loading after 3 months. Outcomes assessed over 12 months included implant stability (measured by implant stability quotient [ISQ]), marginal bone loss (via cone beam computed tomography), peri-implant soft tissue health, and patient satisfaction (visual analog scale [VAS] scale). Data were analyzed using t-tests and chi-square tests, with P < 0.05 considered significant. RESULTS: At 12 months, implant survival was 100% in both groups. Mean marginal bone loss was 0.73 ± 0.22 mm in Group A and 0.69 ± 0.25 mm in Group B (P = 0.54). Mean ISQ at 12 months was 71.6 ± 3.5 (Group A) vs. 72.1 ± 3.2 (Group B) (P = 0.61). Soft tissue indices were comparable. Group A showed significantly higher early patient satisfaction (VAS 9.2 ± 0.8 vs. 7.4 ± 1.1, P < 0.01), though differences were negligible at 12 months. CONCLUSION: Both immediate and delayed loading protocols demonstrated comparable clinical and radiographic outcomes. Immediate loading offers superior early patient satisfaction without compromising implant success, suggesting it as a viable option for anterior single-tooth rehabilitation in suitable cases.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。