Abstract
Microbial biomass is a key parameter needed for the quantification of microbial turnover rates and their contribution to the biogeochemical element cycles. However, estimates of microbial biomass rely on empirically derived mass-to-volume relationships, and large discrepancies exist between the available empirical conversion factors. Here we report a significant nonlinear relationship between carbon mass and cell volume ([Formula: see text]; [Formula: see text]) based on direct cell mass, volume, and elemental composition measurements of 12 prokaryotic species with average volumes between 0.011 and 0.705 μm3 The carbon mass density of our measured cells ranged from 250 to 1,800 fg of C μm-3 for the measured cell volumes. Compared to other currently used models, our relationship yielded up to 300% higher carbon mass values. A compilation of our and previously published data showed that cells with larger volumes (>0.5 μm3) display a constant (carbon) mass-to-volume ratio, whereas cells with volumes below 0.5 μm3 exhibit a nonlinear increase in (carbon) mass density with decreasing volume. Small microorganisms dominate marine and freshwater bacterioplankton as well as soils and marine and terrestrial subsurface. The application of our experimentally determined conversion factors will help to quantify the true contribution of these microorganisms to ecosystem functions and global microbial biomass.IMPORTANCE Microorganisms are a major component of Earth's biosphere, and their activity significantly affects the biogeochemical cycling of bioavailable elements. To correctly determine the flux of carbon and energy in the environment, reliable estimates of microbial abundances and cellular carbon content are necessary. However, accurate assessments of cellular carbon content and dry weight are not trivial to obtain. Here we report direct measurements of cell dry and carbon mass of environmentally relevant prokaryotic microorganisms using a microfluidic mass sensor. We show a significant nonlinear relationship between carbon mass and cell volume and discuss this relationship in the light of currently used cellular mass models.