A Comparative Study of Gemcitabine-Cisplatin vs. Dose-Dense MVAC (Methotrexate, Vinblastine, Doxorubicin, and Cisplatin) as Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: A Single-Institution Experience

吉西他滨-顺铂方案与高剂量MVAC方案(甲氨蝶呤、长春碱、多柔比星和顺铂)作为肌层浸润性膀胱癌新辅助化疗的比较研究:单中心经验

阅读:1

Abstract

Background Muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) involves a high risk of progression and death. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), prior to radical cystectomy (RC), has been shown to improve survival. Gemcitabine-cisplatin (GC) has emerged as a preferred NAC regimen based on its favorable toxicity profile, while dose-dense methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (ddMVAC) may yield better pathologic complete response (pCR) rates, as reported in some studies. Purpose The objective of this study is to compare the efficacy and toxicity profiles of GC and ddMVAC as neoadjuvant regimens in patients with MIBC. Methods This was a retrospective study of 120 patients with clinical stage cT≥2-4a, N+M0 MIBC, treated at a single tertiary cancer center from January 2023 to December 2024. GC was administered to 63 patients, and ddMVAC to 57 patients. Outcomes included pCR, pathologic downstaging, disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity. Results The pCR rate was higher for ddMVAC (22/57 patients, 38.59%) than for GC (14/63 patients, 22.22%) (p = 0.04). Patients with downstaging (≤pT1N0) were more frequent in the ddMVAC group (34/57 patients, 59.64%) compared to the GC group (28/63 patients, 44.44%). The median OS was longer for the ddMVAC group (41.6 months; 95% CI: 35.2-48.9) compared to the GC group (36.8 months; 95% CI: 30.5-42.1) (p = 0.12; HR: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.63-1.06). The incidence of grade ≥3 toxicity was higher for ddMVAC, with 20/57 patients (35%) vs. 10/63 patients (15.87%) for GC. Febrile neutropenia occurred in 8/57 patients (14%) in the ddMVAC group, compared to 3/63 patients (4.76%) in the GC group. Conclusion ddMVAC exhibited higher pCR and downstaging rates than GC, with a tolerable - though higher - rate of toxicity. Both regimens are acceptable options for NAC in MIBC, with treatment choice dependent on each patient's fitness and preferences.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。