The Bidirectional Relationship Between Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) and Asthma in Pediatric and Adult Populations: A Systematic Review

儿童和成人人群中胃食管反流病(GERD)与哮喘的双向关系:系统评价

阅读:1

Abstract

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and asthma are prevalent chronic conditions with a well-documented but complex bidirectional relationship. While previous studies have explored their association, a comprehensive synthesis of evidence across pediatric and adult populations is lacking. This systematic review examines the bidirectional relationship between GERD and asthma, focusing on epidemiological, mechanistic, and clinical aspects. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a systematic search was conducted across PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Science Direct. Eight studies (cohort, case-control, cross-sectional, Mendelian randomization (MR), and bioinformatics analyses) were included after screening 329 records. Data were extracted on study design, population, diagnostic criteria, and key findings. The risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) and Mendelian Randomization Quality (MR-Q) tool. Evidence supports a bidirectional association, with GERD increasing asthma risk (HR 1.62, 95% CI 1.21-2.18) and asthma elevating GERD risk (HR 1.36, 95% CI 1.20-1.54). MR confirmed genetic pleiotropy (OR 1.21 for GERD → asthma; OR 1.06 for asthma → GERD). Mechanistically, microaspiration, vagal reflexes, and shared pathways (e.g., renin-angiotensin system) were implicated. Pediatric studies highlighted GERD's role in poor asthma control, including increased nocturnal symptoms. However, heterogeneity in diagnostic criteria (ICD codes vs. endoscopy) and residual confounding (e.g., obesity) were limitations. GERD and asthma exhibit a bidirectional relationship driven by genetic, neural, and inflammatory mechanisms. Future research should prioritize randomized trials on combined therapies and deeper exploration of the gut-lung axis. Standardized diagnostics and prospective designs are needed to clarify causal pathways.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。