Abstract
Background: The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between conventional and novel Doppler parameters, including cerebroplacental ratio (CPR), cerebral-placental-uterine ratio (CPUR), umbilical-to-cerebral ratio (UCR), and amniotic-to-umbilical-cerebral ratio (AUCR), with the diagnosis of preeclampsia (PE) and adverse neonatal outcomes in PE cases. Methods: This prospective case-control study was conducted at the Ankara Etlik City Hospital Perinatology Clinic between November 2023 and May 2024. The study population was divided into two groups: Group 1, consisting of 74 patients diagnosed with preeclampsia, and Group 2, consisting of 80 healthy control patients. Composite adverse perinatal outcomes (CANOs) include presence of at least one adverse outcome: 5th-minute APGAR score < 7, transient tachypnea of the newborn (TTN), respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), need for continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), need for mechanical ventilation, neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission, neonatal hypoglycemia, need for phototherapy, intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH), and neonatal sepsis. Results: The CPR, CPUR, and AUCR were significantly lower in the PE group compared to the control group, while the UCR was notably higher in the PE group. Among the combined ratios, the CPUR exhibited the highest diagnostic performance for both PE diagnosis and the prediction of CANOs. Additionally, while the UCR, CPR, and AUCR were significant for PE diagnosis, only AUCR demonstrated a significant association with the prediction of CANOs. Conclusions: Combined Doppler parameters, especially CPUR and AUCR, offer valuable insights into diagnosing PE and predicting CANOs. CPUR demonstrated the highest diagnostic accuracy, underscoring its potential utility in clinical settings.