Comparative study on efficacy of thrombolytic protocols: Dual therapy against standard tPA regimen

溶栓方案疗效的比较研究:双重疗法与标准tPA方案的比较

阅读:1

Abstract

When a blood clot occludes cerebral arteries and causes a stroke, a common cause of global death, thrombolytic therapy steps in as a highly effective treatment to restore the blood flow by dissolving the clot. Thrombolytic therapy is the use of plasminogen activators, including tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) and urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA), either separately or in combination. In this study, a mathematical model of thrombolysis has been developed for nonuniform fibrin clots, which have varying density levels nearer and farther from the cell surface. The non-Newtonian nature of blood flow and the viscoelasticity of vessel walls are considered. The dynamic of the pulsatile flow is described using the mass and momentum conservation laws with the Carreau viscosity model, and the generalized Maxwell model is used for the vessel wall. The transport of drugs and fibrinolytic factors involved in the dissolution process induced by convection and diffusion is considered. The developed model can predict the clot lysis pattern in combined drug therapies and can be used to optimize the drug dosage required for treatment. The model is used to evaluate the safety of dual thrombolytic therapy with tPA bolus and uPA continuous infusion in three different doses and then compared with the FDA-approved regimen and experimental studies. Results show that although dual thrombolytic therapy is safe and does not increase the risk of bleeding, it is not more effective than the FDA-approved regimen in faster clot dissolution and restoration of blood flow.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。