Comparative evaluation of application of bioactive glass desensitizer and dentin bonding agent on prepared vital tooth in postoperative sensitivity at varying time period before cementation: An observational study

比较生物活性玻璃脱敏剂和牙本质粘接剂在预备好的活髓牙术后不同时间段内对牙齿敏感的疗效:一项观察性研究

阅读:1

Abstract

AIM: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of bioactive glass as a desensitizer with dentin bonding agent in preventing the postvital tooth preparation sensitivity at three different time periods. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: An Observational Study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 39 participants of age 25-30 years requiring vital tooth preparation were divided into Group A as control, distilled water as placebo; Group B test control, 7th generation dentin bonding agent; and Group C test, bioactive glass. Dentin hypersensitivity was evaluated on the day of preparation (T0), 7th day after preparation (T1), and 15th day (T2) at the final cementation procedure using the Schiff scale. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: IBM SPSS statistics software, One way analysis of variance (ANOVA), Post hoc Bonferroni. RESULTS: The descriptive statistics showed the mean and standard deviation at preapplication (T0) to be 2.23 ± 0.83, 2.53 ± 0.66, and 2.61 ± 0.65 for Group 1, Group 2, and Group 3, respectively, with no significant difference between the groups (P > 0.05). Intergroup analysis revealed there was a statistical difference between the 3 groups at T1 and T2, with post hoc Bonferroni depicting a lower mean for Group 3 of 1.53 ± 0.87 and 0.76 ± 1.09 at T1 and T2, respectively. CONCLUSION: Bioactive glass has a significant reduction in the dentinal hypersensitivity on the vital prepared tooth compared to both negative control and dentin bonding agent.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。