Comparative evaluation of physicochemical properties of various root canal sealers: An in vitro study

不同根管封闭剂理化性质的比较评价:一项体外研究

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: New endodontic sealers are frequently introduced; hence, understanding the properties of each sealer and choosing the most appropriate one is essential for clinical decision-making. AIM: This study aimed to assess the physicochemical properties of a new zinc oxide eugenol-based sealer (EssenSeal(®)) compared with three other sealers: a calcium hydroxide-based sealer (Hydrosealer), a bioceramic silicone-based sealer (Roeko GuttaFlow), and an epoxy resin-based sealer (AH Plus). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The evaluation included pH, flow, radiopacity, and solubility according to the ISO 6876/2012 standard. pH levels were measured at various time intervals in deionized water (1, 3, 24, 72, 168, 336, and 504 h). Radiopacity was assessed radiographically in millimeters of aluminum, while solubility was determined after 7 days of immersion in deionized water and quantified by mass loss (%). Data analysis involved ANOVA, Kruskal-Wallis, and pairwise comparison tests, with statistical significance set at P < 0.05. RESULTS: EssenSeal(®) exhibited the highest flow and solubility (P < 0.001), while AH Plus showed the highest radiopacity and the lowest pH and solubility (P < 0.001). Except for AH Plus, all sealers demonstrated alkalinization and radiopacity in compliance with ISO 6876 standards. CONCLUSION: EssenSeal(®) showed promising physicochemical properties, but did not fully comply with ISO 6876/2012 standards.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。