Quasi-static and dynamic fracture toughness of 316L stainless steel welds at cryogenic temperatures

低温下316L不锈钢焊缝的准静态和动态断裂韧性

阅读:1

Abstract

This study investigates the cryogenic fracture toughness of four commercially welded 316L stainless steel plates using Charpy-sized single-edge bend [SE(B)] specimens and standard Charpy impact tests, under quasi-static and dynamic loading at 77 K (liquid nitrogen) and 4 K (liquid helium). Despite identical base metal specifications, the welds exhibited substantial variations in mechanical performance due to differences in welding processes and microstructure. The resultant analysis on temperature effects revealed that the only weld fabricated exclusively using gas tungsten arc welding (GTAW) consistently demonstrated the highest fracture toughness by a factor of two at 77 K and a factor of seven at 4 K. In contrast, a welding process that employed flux core arc welding (FCAW) for fill passes that also contained porosity resulted in the lowest overall toughness and greatest degradation (114 kJ/m(2) at 77 K and 21 kJ/m(2) at 4 K). In an effort to deconvolute the numerous competing mechanisms that contribute to toughness degradation, fractographic analysis revealed that minimal cleavage corresponded with the lowest δ-ferrite content, while the greatest amount of cleavage was linked to wormhole porosity and indicative of embrittlement. When analyzing loading rate effects, Charpy absorbed energy at 77 K broadly correlated with quasi-static toughness at 77 K for only three of the four welds. Dynamic toughness testing at 77 K with the SE(B) geometry and the multi-specimen method correlated poorly with quasi-static results using the SE(B) geometry and the single specimen method to produce J-R curves, but moderately (R(2) ≈ 0.76) with Charpy absorbed energy, indicating a stronger dependence on strain rate than intrinsic material toughness. In summary, these findings highlight the critical role of welding process selection, microstructure control, and test methodology in qualifying welds for extreme cryogenic environments and caution against relying solely on Charpy impact testing when atypical weld structures are present.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。