Comparative Effects of Different Surface Treatments on Shear Bond Strength of Metal Brackets Bonded to Eroded Enamel: An in Vitro Study :

不同表面处理对金属托槽粘接于侵蚀牙釉质上的剪切粘接强度的比较效果:一项体外研究:

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare the effects of different surface treatments on shear bond strength (SBS) of metal brackets to eroded enamel. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this in vitro study, 76 extracted premolars were immersed in Coca-Cola 4 times, each time for 2 minutes to cause enamel erosion. They were then randomly assigned to 4 groups (n=19) for surface treatment by acid etching (control), bur grinding plus acid etching, sandblasting plus acid etching, and erbium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Er:YAG) laser irradiation plus acid etching. Metal brackets were then bonded to the buccal surface of the teeth and after thermocycling, their SBS was measured in a universal testing machine. After debonding, the adhesive remnant index (ARI) score was determined under a stereomicroscope. SBS of higher than 6 was considered as optimal (Reynolds threshold). RESULTS: The control group showed the highest, and the laser group showed the lowest SBS; however, the difference in SBS was not statistically significant among the four groups (P=0.35). Acid etching group had 2 cases of failure in SBS values, while other groups had none. The study groups had no significant difference in the ARI scores either (P=0.82); nonetheless, sandblasting and laser groups had the highest frequency of ARI score 3 (all adhesive remaining on the surface). CONCLUSION: Bur grinding, sandblasting, and Er:YAG laser irradiation did not significantly change the SBS of metal brackets to eroded enamel compared with acid etching alone, and all the tested methods yielded acceptable SBS values.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。