Exploring novel of 1,2,4-triazolo[4,3-a]quinoxaline sulfonamide regioisomers as anti-diabetic and anti-Alzheimer agents with in-silico molecular docking simulation

利用计算机分子对接模拟探索新型1,2,4-三唑并[4,3-a]喹喔啉磺酰胺区域异构体作为抗糖尿病和抗阿尔茨海默病药物的潜力

阅读:1

Abstract

In this study, a novel series of 1,2,4-triazolo[4,3-a]quinoxalines containing a sulfonamide moiety was designed and synthesized through regioselective synthesis from 2 and/ 3-hydrazino-6-(pyrrolidin-1-ylsulfonyl)quinoxaline derivatives 5 and 7. The structures of two isomers were confirmed and characterized by IR,(1)H NMR,(13)C NMR, and elemental analysis data. The synthesized 1,2,4-triazolo[4,3-a]quinoxaline derivatives 8-13 were evaluated for their antidiabetic activities by targeting α-amylase and α-glucosidase, as well as for their anti-Alzheimer activity by targeting acetylcholinesterase (AChE) at a concentration of 100 µM. Structure-activity relationship (SAR) analysis was conducted for all analogs, emphasizing the nature of the substituent groups at position one of the triazole nucleus and the positioning of the sulfonamide moiety. For α-amylase and α-glucosidase activity, the designed compounds exhibited moderate to good activity, with inhibitory percentage values ranging from 21.85 ± 0.01% to 64.70 ± 0.02% and from 23.93 ± 0.01% to 75.36 ± 0.01%, respectively. The N-allyl-[1,2,4]triazolo[4,3-a]quinoxalin-1-amine derivative 10a demonstrated the most significant inhibitory activity, with percentages of 64.70 ± 0.02% and 75.36 ± 0.01% against α-amylase and α-glucosidase, respectively, in comparison to acarbose (IP = 67.33 ± 0.01% and 57.79 ± 0.01%). Furthermore, the 1,2,4-triazolo[4,3-a]quinoxaline derivatives 8-13 exhibited low to moderate inhibitory percentages against the acetylcholinesterase enzyme, except for the 1-methyl-[1,2,4]triazolo[4,3-a]quinoxaline derivative 11b which demonstrated the highest inhibitory percentage of 44.78 ± 0.01%, compared to donepezil (IP = 67.27 ± 0.60%). Moreover, the promising derivative 10a demonstrated exceptional inhibitory activity, exhibiting IC(50) values of 3.46 ± 0.06 µM and 6.89 ± 0.09 µM against α-glucosidase and α-amylase, respectively, when compared to acarbose, which has IC(50) values of 4.27 ± 0.06 µM and 5.90 ± 0.09 µM. Finally, molecular docking simulations were performed for compound 10a within α-amylase (PDB: 2QV4) and α-glucosidase (PDB: 3W37), while compound 11b was analyzed within acetylcholinesterase (AChE) (PDB: 4EY7) to assess binding affinity and to explore the binding interactions with the active sites of the enzymes.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。