Comparison of mechanical thrombectomy alone versus post-IV t-PA thrombectomy in acute large artery occlusion within 4.5 hours of symptom onset

比较症状出现后4.5小时内急性大动脉闭塞患者单纯机械取栓术与静脉注射t-PA后取栓术的疗效

阅读:1

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (IV t-PA) is commonly used as bridging therapy before mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in acute ischemic stroke. However, in practice, some patients undergo MT only after IV t-PA has been fully administered. This study aimed to compare clinical and radiological outcomes of MT only versus IV t-PA followed by MT within 4.5 hours of symptom onset. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 190 patients with acute large artery occlusion treated with MT between January 2018 and December 2020. After excluding 53 patients ineligible for IV t-PA. A total of 137 patients were enrolled and categorized into two groups: MT only (n=82, 59.8%) and post-IV t-PA MT (n=55, 40.2%). The primary outcome was successful recanalization; the secondary outcome was a good clinical outcome at 90 days (3-month modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0-2). RESULTS: The successful recanalization rates did not significantly differ between the MT-only and post-IV t-PA MT groups (92.7% vs. 89.1%, p=0.466). Good outcomes at 90 days were not statistically different between both groups (58.5% vs. 61.8%, p=0.701). Multivariable analysis identified baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 0.873; 95% confidence intervals (CI), 0.806-0.946; p<0.001) and door-to-puncture time (adjusted OR 0.987; 95% CI, 0.978-0.997; p=0.009) as independent predictors of outcome. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, MT alone yielded comparable outcomes to IV t-PA followed by MT in patients treated within 4.5 hours. Direct MT may be a reasonable treatment strategy.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。