Abstract
BACKGROUND: Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) have gained significant attention in recent years, yet distinguishing them from protein-coding transcripts remains challenging. Indeed, many lncRNAs share mRNA-like processing and existing sequence-derived signals do not fully capture the coding/non-coding boundary. Recent GENCODE annotation efforts revealed tens of thousands of novel lncRNA sequences as well as the reclassification of some lncRNAs into the protein-coding class, highlighting the need to better characterize transcript features associated with classification uncertainty and errors. RESULTS: We performed uncertainty-aware benchmarking by retraining and evaluating eight transcript classifiers under a controlled protocol on a label-stable GENCODE v46-v47 subset. Beyond conventional model evaluation metrics, we quantified inter-tool agreement and entropy-based uncertainty to stratify transcripts into consensus, discordant, and consensus-error groups. To expand standard sequence and ORF-derived signals, we incorporated repeat-derived features from mature transcripts and non-B DNA motif features across gene bodies. Although aggregate performance was high, ∼45% of transcripts showed inter-tool discordance, particularly among lncRNAs. Feature analyses linked low-uncertainty predictions to strong coding-like signals, whereas high-uncertainty profiles exhibited mixed signatures. Alongside classical predictors in global importance analyses, repeat-derived features appear as main contributors. CONCLUSIONS: By combining controlled benchmarking with transcript-level agreement and uncertainty stratification, together with extended feature profiling, we identified patterns associated with classifier disagreement and misclassification. This novel framework provides practical guidance for interpreting predictions, motivating the development of more robust coding/non-coding classifiers, while also shedding light on the sequence properties that distinguish lncRNA sequences.