Comparison of Tomographic Findings in Patients with Influenza A (H1N1) and COVID-19

甲型流感(H1N1)和新冠肺炎患者的断层扫描结果比较

阅读:1

Abstract

Objectives: The objective of this study was to identify CT-based predictors of mechanical ventilation and mortality in patients with severe and critical viral pneumonia and to examine the association between imaging severity and outcomes in ventilated patients. Methods: We analyzed pulmonary CT scans from 148 patients with severe or critical pneumonia caused by COVID-19 (n = 98) or influenza A H1N1 (n = 50). Patients were assessed based on tomographic patterns, demographics, clinical severity scores (Charlson Comorbidity Index, SOFA, and APACHE IV), and biomarkers. Survival analyses were performed using Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariable Cox regression. Results: Bilateral, peripheral, and basal lung involvement was common across both groups. Ground-glass opacities (89.62%, p ≤ 0.001) and consolidation (61.54%, p = 0.001) were more prevalent in COVID-19, whereas pleural effusion was significantly more frequent in H1N1 (76.92%, p ≤ 0.001). COVID-19 cases more often presented with bilateral (96.94%) and peripheral lesions (77.87%). H1N1 patients were more likely to develop severe ARDS and require mechanical ventilation. In COVID-19, higher APACHE IV scores and pulmonary damage severity index were independently associated with increased mortality. Conclusions: Radiologic and clinical severity profiles differ between COVID-19 and H1N1 pneumonia. CT-based assessments combined with prognostic scores may aid early risk stratification and guide treatment decisions in patients with severe viral pneumonia.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。