Early Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Calcaneal Lengthening Osteotomy for Symptomatic Flexible Flatfoot

症状性柔韧性扁平足行跟骨延长截骨术后早期患者报告结局

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Calcaneal lengthening osteotomy (CLO) is frequently utilized to treat painful flexible flatfoot (FF) in children. The purpose of this investigation is to analyze the impact of CLO on patient reported pain and mobility using Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores in a cohort of pediatric patients treated for painful FF. METHODS: Children aged 8-18 who underwent CLO for painful FF correction were included. Retrospective chart review for PROMIS scores of pain and mobility were collected. Preoperative PROMIS scores were compared to PROMIS scores collected within 6-12 months postoperatively. Five PROMIS points was determined to be a minimal clinically significant difference, as this is half of the SD of the PROMIS metric. Preoperative and postoperative AP/lateral talo-first metatarsal angles were collected and compared. The patients with residual pain (PROMIS >55) after CLO were evaluated, and the effect of potential factors on residual postoperative pain was assessed. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients with 31 feet were included in the study, with an average age of 12.2 (range, 9-15) years at the time of surgery. Mean preoperative pain and mobility PROMIS scores were 53.6 (range, 32.2-69.6) and 42.5 (range, 25.5-56.4), respectively. Mean postoperative pain and mobility PROMIS scores were 47.1 (range, 32.0-59.0) and 48.3 (range, 31.6-61.7), respectively. Patients who received CLO had significant improvement in both pain (P = .005) and mobility (P = .017). Average pain and mobility decreased by 6.51 points and increased by 5.81 points, respectively, after CLO, both clinically significant improvements. CONCLUSION: In early follow-up, we found the use of calcaneal lengthening osteotomy used to treat children for painful idiopathic flexible flatfoot to be associated with significant improvements in pain and mobility PROMIS scores. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, retrospective case series study.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。