Organisational and professional interventions to promote the uptake of evidence in emergency care: Effects on professional practice and health outcomes

促进急诊护理中循证实践应用的组织和专业干预措施:对专业实践和健康结果的影响

阅读:1

Abstract

This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (Intervention). The objectives are as follows: Principle research objective To determine the effectiveness of organisational and professional interventions on the uptake of research evidence in Emergency Practice Settings. Secondary research objective To determine which factors might modify the uptake of research evidence in Emergency Practice Settings. We will explore the following possible effect modifiers across studies: 1. Content: interventions that target a specific topic or behavior in emergency medicine. 2. Type of ED: rural or urban; pediatric, adult or mixed; private or public; primary or tertiary; public or private. 3. Health professional targeted (single or interdisciplinary). 4. Type of intervention. 5. Cost of intervention. To address the objectives the following comparisons will be explored: 1. Effectiveness of single organisational interventions compared with no intervention. 2. Effectiveness of multiple organisational interventions compared with no intervention. 3. Effectiveness of multiple organisational interventions compared with single interventions. 4. Effectiveness of clinical practice guidelines compared with no intervention. 5. Effectiveness of organisational interventions and clinical practice guidelines compared with no intervention. 6. Effectiveness of clinical practice guidelines with other professional interventions compared with clinical practice guidelines and no intervention.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。